On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> but the question of >> error in process is; does the RFC lack communication requirement with >> the community? >> > > Sorry if not clear. I mean that as some participant are requesting a > scientific approach to struggling with 2119 (i.e. thread-subject), > does that mean in some RFCs the use or not use (i.e. we see that > participant use different approaches to follow the 2119) that it may > add communication confuse with some of community? > I'm absolutely certain that some of our community is confused about something related to this thread. Given the absence of information that would help in a decision, might preference would be just to pick one, and provide a stick for hitting those who do it the other way. -- Dean