Re: I'm struggling with 2219 language again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 01/07/2013 12:19 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
> 
> Well, I've learned some things here, and shall attempt to summarize:
> 
> 1) First. the "1" key is really close to the "2" key, and my spell-checker 
> doesn't care. Apparently,  I'm not alone in this problem.
> 
> 2) We're all over the map in our use of 2119 language, and it is creating 
> many headaches beyond my own.
> 
> 3) The majority of respondents feel that 2119 language should be used as 
> stated in 2119 -- sparingly, and free that MUST is not a substitute for 
> "does". But some people feel we need a more formal specification language 
> that goes beyond "key point compliance" or "requirements definition", and 
> some are using 2119 words in that role and like it.
> 
> I'm torn as to what to do with the draft in question. I picked up an 
> editorial role after the authors fatigued in response to some 100+ AD 
> comments (with several DISCUSSes) and a gen-art review that proposed
> adding several hundred 2119 invocations (and that was backed up with a
> DISCUSS demeaning that the gen-art comments be dealt with). My co-editor,
> who is doing most of the key-stroking, favors lots of 2119 language. And I
> think it turns the draft into unreadable felrgercarb.

My proposal for the aforementioned draft is to put on hold for now the edits
related to this discussion, then let the WG, IETF (during last call) and IESG
decide what to do.  The edits are done and ready to be merged, so the painful
part is already done: https://github.com/petithug/p2psip-base-master/branches.

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=4vXi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]