On 12/1/12 2:21 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > My reluctance to get into this is based on an opinion that process > change proposals with more words attached tend to just not happen, > so fewer words is better. I think that's actually a pretty terrible reason. The goal is not to get the proposal through, the goal is to improve something. That said, while I don't like change just for the sake of change I think that change for the sake of betterment is a very good thing indeed. The main thing is that I've been trying to figure out where the harm would be here and I haven't been able to identify anything substantive. I'd be good with giving this a limited run and seeing how it goes. Melinda