Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Barry responded...

On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 09:50 -0500, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Elwyn says...
> 
> > However, I don't think that a short last call cycle need necessarily
> > compromise cross-area review. There has always been the possibility for
> > authors or wg chairs to request a early gen-art review with a view to
> > checking out whether something is in good shape cross-area and for
> > non-specialists.  This facility is not much used (I think I have done 3
> > in 8 years on the gen-art team) but it is there, and I guess the team
> > could cope with a few more since it doesn't drastically alter the total
> > workload. So it would be entirely possible for a draft that might be
> > fast-tracked to get some early review.
> 
> Do you really think it's likely that a chair who's trying to
> fast-track a document will likely go out asking for early GenART,
> SecDir, AppDir, and OpsDir reviews?
> 
A few do already.  But seriously, if the wg chair(s) actually have an
interest in the technology and feel there is a valid reason for getting
something decent out into the world quickly then they could well be
motivated to do just that.  If our wg chairs are really just
bureaucratic process minders then it's time we found some different
ones, but I don't think they are. Maybe this is just a plea for a bit
more parallel processing and a few less silos.

/Elwyn 



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]