Re: Idea for a process experiment to reward running code...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Stephen> On 12/03/2012 02:50 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
    >> I'd really prefer if we'd talk about open source being desirable,
    >> but not having it be necessary.

    Stephen> Yep. I got another comment to that effect as well.  I'll
    Stephen> try address that (but that's not done yet).

For myself, I think the requirement for open-source is very good for
this experiment, or something like it.

People can examine the open-source implementation and consider the
question of whether the implementation explores enough of the edge cases
that a process short-cut is appropriate.  I think that's important in
this, so I'd be a lot more comfortable with this with an open-source
requirement.



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]