Hiya, On 12/16/2012 10:27 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > On 12/16/2012 04:49 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> ISTM that you are of the opinion that anything the IETF >> does to go faster is bad in and of itself because its >> scary. > It's not that simple, at least in my opinion. > > I'm generally fine with fast tracking a document that describes a simple > protocol that is easily understood, easily implemented, > noncontroversial, and has a limited impact. In all other cases, I think > that more deliberation is appropriate. That's not to say that IETF > currently makes good use of deliberation time. But I'd rather see it > make better use of that time, than to try to reduce that time without > first improving protocol and document quality. For example, I'd like to > see earlier and more explicit cross-area review. All reasonable stuff and the draft says that this won't be suitable for all cases. If you've better wording to suggest that'd be welcome. Cheers, S. > > Keith > > >