-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/03/2012 08:54 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > On 12/03/2012 04:41 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: >> I support this idea, but I think that free software should also be >> considered as part of this experiment (free software and open source are >> not synonymous). Using the acronym FOSS and defining it as Free or Open >> Source Software in the document would achieve this. > > Fair point. OTOH, there are folks who want to not require open-source too. > For now, I'd gone with "ideally open-source." As I said to Sam, let's deal > with that, if need be, at IETF LC. OK, but note that I will oppose for this experiment the use of software that is not either available in source form or accompanied with a conformance test suite. > > In the meantime, I've posted -01 [1] with a bunch of changes. Do let me > know if I forgot to ack someone and as before all comments (inevitable, > this being a process thing;-) are very welcome. > > Thanks, S. > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-ft-01 > - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQvNv6AAoJECnERZXWan7EV3QP/2Tv/rn7+GSwK2KkB3RsnS00 ryB5FH0drUdMr7c+TreHDXh/uR6HLYxB1Cg9rDd5CZQaSBQlTtwIKVUxMPOW805k Uf3/xi8d3DpXVTmlesMtmbT/GeE7S0hJ3wf6LUwl4OkctX8GMDNuaONNudarl3Qt sR+AJw8OU8KOFMqEn6fOqpLwY7OiQG3M6tuMwfNIm1Z0bHb/WAssF9l+J2ZTqq8L AmJpHPql65WVSPck+jRnYyNtfnSkVCmCQ1y5cMeNoEnm5tkEt5oeinsvDwEAWBB3 5YzbUb+q72SCEyTbeVOrwTU1cBU/CKzOH+8r0ykK51KlZ1acYetwh31U4h1jDpHd tNrwu1Z5wvKCa4b4dvzkiEBE83gAr6IGMDlPWNkEtotB1ZZd/MUpRNsSCzyivtl5 zr1rwpMY/5w6LljGO4jN4ZXKtXErFovEQpTc+bUz9K23WYyZMkARehXZLkbEvpb8 /MY1zGlgRSrGHr5Wn+k9egCeWqYjGNQedYpDcqWw7oQ5V956W+/AvKHo6jPGGweC wpW3Hm+AWc3gPZ2pgYYt8dVScscWLo0qDWW4daHwAqu0rvge7PUB8aVagE72fQUn fPEPhETD2QqZfXDeCtfNqOVS1/v+SYsAYxcGFYwu7NR51OROBkhMpWT5KDuaPp02 OPRv2MwPcsanVoQ1uNfY =30oW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----