Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• Re: Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: java packaging.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Zing
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Mono packaging guidelines
  • From: Paul
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Build Error (Job 11111): dejavu-fonts-2_7_0-0_16_943~20060614svn_fc6 on fedora-development-extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Michael J Knox
• Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ian Burrell
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Proposal: Standardized License tags
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ian Burrell
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Paul
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: RFC: init script naming
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: RFC: init script naming
  • From: Leszek Matok
• Re: RFC: init script naming
  • From: Jesse Keating
• RFC: init script naming
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• java packaging.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: libtool archives (.la files) and rpm packaging
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• libtool archives (.la files) and rpm packaging
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Mono Packaging (was Re: On the subject of sponsors...)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• proper way to install emacs lisp add-ons?
  • From: Zing
• new wiki-page: Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Dave Jones
• Re: kernel module packaging
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• kernel module packaging
  • From: Jon Masters
• Accessibility packages (speech-dispatcher + speechd-up)
  • From: Hynek Hanke
• Re: Re: teTeX is EOL
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: teTeX is EOL
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: teTeX is EOL
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• teTeX is EOL
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Debuginfo packages
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: Debuginfo packages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Debuginfo packages
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Debuginfo packages
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: %doc and docdir conflicts
  • From: Rex Dieter
• %doc and docdir conflicts
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Non standard locations for man pages
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Non standard locations for man pages
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Non standard locations for man pages
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Re: xorg-x11- packaging prefix
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: xorg-x11- packaging prefix
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: License Review
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: License Review
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: License Review
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: License Review
  • From: Matthew Miller
• License Review
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Please help with vim/emacs files
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: core dev's have a ways to go
  • From: Jesse Keating
• core dev's have a ways to go
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Iago Rubio
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Iago Rubio
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• License landscape (and question of best pratice)
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: --vendor fedora, rationale/motivation?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: --vendor fedora, rationale/motivation?
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: --vendor fedora, rationale/motivation?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• --vendor fedora, rationale/motivation?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• PLEASE HELP - We need a policy for preventing man page name conflicts
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: fontname-fonts or fonts-fontname?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: fontname-fonts or fonts-fontname?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: fontname-fonts or fonts-fontname?
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: fontname-fonts or fonts-fontname?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• fontname-fonts or fonts-fontname?
  • From: Dawid Gajownik
• Re: Python eggs
  • From: Elliot Lee
• Re: Specfile suggestion for subpackages with differently linked binaries
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: Replacing LAM with OpenMPI in Fedora Core
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Python eggs
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Specfile suggestion for subpackages with differently linked binaries
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Python eggs
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: Python eggs
  • From: Elliot Lee
• Re: Python eggs
  • From: Michael Weiner
• Python eggs
  • From: Alan Milligan
• Specfile suggestion for subpackages with differently linked binaries
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Heads-up: "RFC: kernel-modules in Fedora Extras" now on fedora-extras-list
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: pango modules packaging question
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: pango modules packaging question
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• pango modules packaging question
  • From: Michael Peters
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: José Pedro Oliveira
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• [RFR] Handling of %doc files
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Maintainer of the Zope packages?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Maintainer of the Zope packages?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Maintainer of the Zope packages?
  • From: Andreas Jung
• perl-* package naming clarification
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Some packaging guidelines suggestions
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Some packaging guidelines suggestions
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Some packaging guidelines suggestions
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Python byte-compilation
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python byte-compilation
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Python byte-compilation
  • From: Alan Milligan
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: seth vidal
• kernel-module-proposal 2 and yum: some tests
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Installing man pages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Installing man pages
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Re: Installing man pages
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Installing man pages
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Installing man pages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Installing man pages
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Installing man pages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Alan Milligan
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Alan Milligan
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Alan Milligan
• Python Packaging Hints
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Re: Name of Gnome applet packages (was: RE: Name of x11 applet packages (common preffix?))
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: Name of Gnome applet packages (was: RE: Name of x11 applet packages (common preffix?))
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Name of Gnome applet packages (was: RE: Name of x11 applet packages (common preffix?))
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Name of x11 applet packages (common preffix?)
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: Name of x11 applet packages (common preffix?)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Name of x11 applet packages (common preffix?)
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Ricardo Veguilla González
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Ricardo Veguilla González
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Ricardo Veguilla González
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Ricardo Veguilla González
• Re: gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• gnome-screensaver packaging problem
  • From: Ricardo Veguilla Gonzalez
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Who owns /usr/share/locale/<lang>?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Who owns /usr/share/locale/<lang>?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Who owns /usr/share/locale/<lang>?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Who owns /usr/share/locale/<lang>?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Who owns /usr/share/locale/<lang>?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: kernel-modules in the buildsystem (Was: Re: Stuff to look for in plague 0.4)
  • From: Matt Domsch
• Re: kernel-modules in the buildsystem (Was: Re: Stuff to look for in plague 0.4)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kernel-modules in the buildsystem (Was: Re: Stuff to look for in plague 0.4)
  • From: seth vidal
• kernel-modules in the buildsystem (Was: Re: Stuff to look for in plague 0.4)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: PDFlib-Lite license
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: PDFlib-Lite license
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: PDFlib-Lite license
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• PDFlib-Lite license
  • From: Jose' Matos
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Andreas Gruenbacher
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Andreas Gruenbacher
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Kernel Module Packages
  • From: Andreas Gruenbacher
• Re: To .pyo or not to .pyo?
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Re: To .pyo or not to .pyo?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: To .pyo or not to .pyo?
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• To .pyo or not to .pyo?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: rpmlint warning
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• rpmlint warning
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: updating versions policy
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Tool to determine what files require what
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Re: Tool to determine what files require what
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: Tool to determine what files require what
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Tool to determine what files require what
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Tool to determine what files require what
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Multiline %defines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Multiline %defines
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Multiline %defines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Building src.rpm's outside of mock/mach
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Kenneth Porter
• Re: Building src.rpm's outside of mock/mach
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Building src.rpm's outside of mock/mach
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Using %{dist} for conditional compilation
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: updating versions policy
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: updating versions policy
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• updating versions policy
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Where to install examples to?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Where to install examples to?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] OpenAFS kernel-module package
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] OpenAFS kernel-module package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• [Fedora-packaging] OpenAFS kernel-module package
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Steven Pritchard
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] kver in release (was: Re: rpms/kernel-module-thinkpad/devel kernel-module-thinkpad-console.perms, NONE, 1.1 kernel-module-thinkpad.modules, NONE, 1.1 kernel-module-thinkpad.spec, 1.7, 1.8 kernel-module-thinkpad-README.Fedora, 1.1, NONE"
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] what about fedora?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] kver in release (was: Re: rpms/kernel-module-thinkpad/devel kernel-module-thinkpad-console.perms, NONE, 1.1 kernel-module-thinkpad.modules, NONE, 1.1 kernel-module-thinkpad.spec, 1.7, 1.8 kernel-module-thinkpad-README.Fedora, 1.1, NONE"
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] what about fedora?
  • From: Adrian Chelar
• [Fedora-packaging] kver in release (was: Re: rpms/kernel-module-thinkpad/devel kernel-module-thinkpad-console.perms, NONE, 1.1 kernel-module-thinkpad.modules, NONE, 1.1 kernel-module-thinkpad.spec, 1.7, 1.8 kernel-module-thinkpad-README.Fedora, 1.1, NONE"
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] packages which add user accounts: is fedora-usermgmt the way?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] example kernel-module package
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %check script issues
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %check script issues
  • From: Marius Feraru
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• [Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %check script issues
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] tetex packaging question
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• [Fedora-packaging] %check script issues
  • From: Marius Feraru
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] tetex packaging question
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] tetex packaging question
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• [Fedora-packaging] tetex packaging question
  • From: Michael A. Peters
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: seth vidal
• [Fedora-packaging] Using self-Obsoletes instead of Epoch bumps?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] "License" tag for GPL w/ exception
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] "License" tag for GPL w/ exception
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines with packages from CVS
  • From: Colin Charles
• [Fedora-packaging] Packages changing SELinux configurations
  • From: Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Can you review my specfile: rsnapshot.spec
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Can you review my specfile: rsnapshot.spec
  • From: Gavin Henry
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Can you review my specfile: rsnapshot.spec
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Can you review my specfile: rsnapshot.spec
  • From: Gavin Henry
• [Fedora-packaging] Can you review my specfile: rsnapshot.spec
  • From: Gavin Henry
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: dist tag usage
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: fedora-pkg] dist tag revisited
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] dist tag revisited
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: dist tag revisited
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] dist tag revisited
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] dist tag revisited
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Jeff Pitman
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress for perl modules
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress for perl modules
  • From: Alan Milligan
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• [Fedora-packaging] perl module MODULE_COMPAT
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress for perl modules
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress for perl modules
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• [Fedora-packaging] %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress for perl modules
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages
  • From: Alexandre Oliva
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages
  • From: Warren Togami
• [Fedora-packaging] questions regarding kernel-devel and kernel-smp-devel packages
  • From: Jeff Spaleta
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Running scriptlets only in certain situations
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Alternative kernel packages
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] Alternative kernel packages
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• [Fedora-packaging] dist tag revisited
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Importing tetex packages question
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Importing tetex packages question
  • From: José Pedro Oliveira
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Importing tetex packages question
  • From: José Pedro Oliveira
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Importing tetex packages question
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• [Fedora-packaging] Importing tetex packages question
  • From: José Pedro Oliveira
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: gnome-theme-clearlooks please Re: APPROVED: clearlooks
  • From: Dag Wieers
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: APPROVED: clearlooks
  • From: Dag Wieers
• [Fedora-packaging] Device node packaging question
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: GConf schema packaging guidelines
  • From: Toshio
• [Fedora-packaging] Running scriptlets only in certain situations
  • From: Chuck R. Anderson
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: GConf schema packaging guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: GConf schema packaging guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: GConf schema packaging guidelines
  • From: Toshio
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: note about packaging init scripts
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Paul Nasrat
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] No modifying %{SOURCE} during rpmbuild
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] No modifying %{SOURCE} during rpmbuild
  • From: Cristian Gafton
• [Fedora-packaging] No modifying %{SOURCE} during rpmbuild
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Dag Wieers
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• [Fedora-packaging] X-Fedora vs. X-Fedora-Extra vs. X-Fedora-Extras
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: R P Herrold
• local internal libraries (Was Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] NewPackageProcess, comment on Patch0 vs Patch
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] NewPackageProcess, comment on Patch0 vs Patch
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] NewPackageProcess, comment on Patch0 vs Patch
  • From: Cristian Gafton
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• [Fedora-packaging] NewPackageProcess, comment on Patch0 vs Patch
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?
  • From: Troy Dawson
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Cristian Gafton
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• [Fedora-packaging] Removing all zero epochs from spec files in devel branch
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?
  • From: Chuck R. Anderson
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: [Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?
  • From: Ville Skyttä