On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 18:42 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:26 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 18:04 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 10:40 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > > As an aside, I didn't think Extras was ready to tackle the issue of > > > > kernel module packages yet. > > > > > > Right, at least three issues remain: how to name the modules, how to > > > make depsolvers do the right thing with them, and how to request builds > > > for i586 and i686 from the build system for the same package. > > > > Screw i586 for now. > > I'll screw it once the i586 kernel is screwed from FC :) Seriously, > there are cases where i586 and external kernel modules are a valid > scenario; As architectures actually are switched outside of rpm-specs (rpmbuild --target=..) this isn't a packaging issue, but actually is a build system issue. I.e. the buildsystem has to be equipped with means to specify architectures, because rpm specs can't handle it. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
