Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kmod: $1 in %post and firends broken (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kmod: $1 in %post and firends broken (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Friday 1PM EDT IRC Meeting
  • From: Warren Togami
• mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: The .pc and pkgconfig issue
  • From: Rex Dieter
• kmod: $1 in %post and firends broken (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• kmdls: very good support for custom kernels (was: kernel-module packaging discussing ...)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• flexibility of kmdl interface (was: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• OT: xen vs xen0 (was: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• The .pc and pkgconfig issue
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• kernel-module packaging discussing broken into pieces: One specfile approach vs. splitted spec file
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Forbidden software in FE
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: José Matos
• Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Benny Amorsen
• Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Attention kernel module project packagers!
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmod support - a diary of workarounds
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: fedorakmod.py unfixable
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach (was: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Proposal: reject the one-spec approach (was: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• kmod support - a diary of workarounds (was: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Pointer: Packaging discussion about Boost (C++) library
  • From: Kenneth Porter
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• get further rid of uname -r in the kmod stuff and solve the remaining kmod problem
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• fedorakmod.py unfixable (was: atrpms kernel modules)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Mail voting on kmdl adoption
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Missing IRCs
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Missing this week's meetings (again)
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Do we need a Rule "Docs should be packaged as %doc"?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• kmdl proposal and kmod flaws
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: blocking kmdl adoption at all costs?
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• blocking kmdl adoption at all costs? (was: atrpms kernel modules)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Fix problems building Extras packages for FC3 and FC4
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: Fwd: When to use perl(:WITH_...) requires?
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: Fwd: When to use perl(:WITH_...) requires?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fwd: When to use perl(:WITH_...) requires?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Fwd: When to use perl(:WITH_...) requires?
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: missing this week's meetings
  • From: Matthew Miller
• missing this week's meetings
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• missing this week's IRC meeting(s)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: yum kmdl plugin (was: atrpms kernel modules)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: yum kmdl plugin (was: atrpms kernel modules)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: yum kmdl plugin (was: atrpms kernel modules)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• yum kmdl plugin (was: atrpms kernel modules)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: PFJ
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: PFJ
• Re: Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Advice sought on a package currently under review
  • From: PFJ
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: BuildRoot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• BuildRoot
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• PHP guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: seth vidal
• COPYING (license) not under docdir
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Extras packages violating versioning schemes
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: rawhide report: 20060721 changes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Yum Kernel Module Plugin
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Yum Kernel Module Plugin
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Yum Kernel Module Plugin
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Yum Kernel Module Plugin
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Yum Kernel Module Plugin
  • From: Jack Neely
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Minutes/Logs of 20060713 anyone?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: [Bug 198881] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-IRCD
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Minutes/Logs of 20060713 anyone?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Minutes/Logs of 20060713 anyone?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: atrpms kernel modules
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java Naming Page
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Java Naming Page
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: installation of info files
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: installation of info files
  • From: Christian . Iseli
• Re: installation of info files
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: installation of info files
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: installation of info files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Packaging Committee Information
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• installation of info files
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: To noarch or arch for arch specific script packages?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: To noarch or arch for arch specific script packages?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: To noarch or arch for arch specific script packages?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: To noarch or arch for arch specific script packages?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Single package directory ownership
  • From: Mike A. Harris
• Re: Single package directory ownership
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Single package directory ownership
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Single package directory ownership
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Single package directory ownership
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Single package directory ownership
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Single package directory ownership
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: To noarch or arch for arch specific script packages?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• To noarch or arch for arch specific script packages?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: Re: compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Uneditable wiki pages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• compat packages: worst-case scenario - conflicts
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: David Lutterkort
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• PackagingDrafts/DisttagsForRawHide (was: fc5.90/fc5.91/... disttags and automated rebuilds (was: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6?))
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: New Mono Page for new guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: New Mono Page for new guidelines
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: New Mono Page for new guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: how to get direct link of some parts on packaging guidelines wiki page
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: how to get direct link of some parts on packaging guidelines wiki page
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Disttags for FL (was: Upgrade path consistency among all Fedora Projects)
  • From: Jesse Keating
• fc5.90/fc5.91/... disttags and automated rebuilds (was: Mass rebuild of Extras packages for FC6?)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Disttags for FL (was: Upgrade path consistency among all Fedora Projects)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• how to get direct link of some parts on packaging guidelines wiki page
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: New Mono Page for new guidelines
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Re: rpms/haddock/devel haddock.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Christopher Stone
• New Mono Page for new guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: rpms/haddock/devel haddock.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• PHP packaging policy notes
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: Re: rpms/haddock/devel haddock.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: rpms/haddock/devel haddock.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: rpms/haddock/devel haddock.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/haddock/devel haddock.spec,1.2,1.3
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Open issues with the PHP guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Including License doc in packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Including License doc in packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Including License doc in packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Including License doc in packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: soname change policy proposal
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: License tag in packages
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Including License doc in packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Including License doc in packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• License tag in packages
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Andreas Thienemann
• Re: release tag question.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: release tag question.
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• release tag question.
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Michael J. Knox
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Jesse Keating
• -devel rpms with pkgconfig files should 'Requires: pkgconfig'
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Mono conversations
  • From: Paul
• Re: libexecdir, rpmlint, and Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: libexecdir, rpmlint, and Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: libexecdir, rpmlint, and Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: libexecdir, rpmlint, and Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: libexecdir, rpmlint, and Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• libexecdir, rpmlint, and Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Mono Packaging Issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Namespace for cross-compilation tools?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius