On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 10:03 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 16:15 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:54:22AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> > Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> >> > > Two independent reviewer considered this a blocker for a
> >> > > review's acceptance (even though it's marked "preferred").
>
> >> > The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A working
> >> > (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker.
>
> > The point you seem to be missing, your buildroot is broken:
> > buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
>
> And you missed the point that *in the context of Fedora Extras*, it's not
> broken.
Rebuilding rpms by users is not amongst the Fedora tasks?
FE is living in the ivory towers of mock?
With all due respect, ....
Ralf
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
