Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:35:53AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >b) put a sensible default in the guidelines >> >> IMO, the guidelines already include a sensible default. > > In short id -un doesn't make sense, even epoch or target/arch > would make more far more sense in a guideline's BuildRoot. > > Note that the guidelines are also there to educate people how to write > clean and non-obfuscated specfiles. I'm quite sure the BuildRoot is > cut & pasted in 99.99% of the packages making it a defacto proper > thing to do. If it's bogus we need to fix it and not endorse it > furthermore. It's simply my opinion that it's not worth fixing something that isn't broken. > Two independent reviewer considered this a blocker for a > review's acceptance (even though it's marked "preferred"). The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A working (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker. -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
