Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 16:15 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:54:22AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > Axel Thimm wrote:
>> > > Two independent reviewer considered this a blocker for a
>> > > review's acceptance (even though it's marked "preferred").
>> > The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A working
>> > (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker.
> The point you seem to be missing, your buildroot is broken:
> buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
And you missed the point that *in the context of Fedora Extras*, it's not
broken.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
