Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 18:27 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
We've got two differing opinions on this, would anybody else like to
chime in?
I think that if the usual method of using a -devel package is by using
its .pc file with pkgconfig, then pkgconfig should be a dependency of
that package. If the .pc file is provided as a convenience but most
users of a particular -devel package don't use it, then don't add the dep.
That sounds nice, but I think it's too subjective to be an effective
practical rule that would really achieve much at all.
Note that no matter if the *.pc file is actually every used by anything,
there's always the issue of installing stuff into unowned dirs if the
dependency is not there (%{_libdir}/pkgconfig in this case), which is an
explicit MUST no-no in the current review guidelines. This assumes that
only pkgconfig owns the dir; owning it in all packages would feel
somewhat silly to me.
My +1 to always adding the dependency in packages that install *.pc
files.
I will add a +1 one to Ville's comment. Seems the most reasonable.
Michael
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
