On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 13:37 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 06:32:47AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > While we're on the subject, what's the importance that the license file > > under %_docdir anyway? As far as I'm concerned, as long as the license > > is in the package somewhere, that's should be sufficient. > > Easier mass-review by legal? It's easier to check there than rpm > -ql'ing the package and browsing though all file lists. A real legal review would have to look into each and every file in any case. No matter which kind of "detached license files" a package's tarball is accompanied by, or an FE rpm-packager might have added. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
