tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jason L Tibbitts III) writes: > ES> IMO, drafts should reflect the state of current discussion and > ES> should be updated. It does not help when discussion on maillist is > ES> ignored and some obsolete document will be ratified. > > If you're trying to tell me that I shouldn't have tried then I'll be > happy to stop. No; I just think that the proposer of a draft shall maintain and update it. Wrong/outdated information is much more worse than missing one. Enrico
Attachment:
pgpeD4CaPbjs7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
