Re: Re: Kernel Module Packaging Standard Teleconference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 11:20 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:

> I would like to suggest Jack Neely and Seth Vital. The latter as a
> neutral authority on yum and friends to judge on the technical issues
> raised and the former as the author of the yum support for kmod which
> IMHO is not working and connot be made to work as well as a big
> opponent of the new scheme. A working yum is a key point and it would
> be good to have a fast return of feedback. If they can be convinced
> that the kmod scheme is unsupportable from yum's POV we're already
> almost done.


umm, no. I'm not getting dragged into this.

What the kmod plugin does is what it does and it has worked for me for
the cases I have (which is only openafs).

But I'm not going to be a judge of anything. I'm not on the packaging
committee, anyway.

-sv


-sv


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux