Hi Warren, On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 08:16:26PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > After weeks of discourse on IRC and mailing list discussions, we > seem to be unable to make progress toward an amicable agreement. > [...] If the packaging committee cannot come to key agreements, > then the matter will be escalated to the Fedora Project Board who > will make the key decisions. there was a staged unbundled voting proposal last week: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-August/msg00061.html and there are three people that voted (2 in favor, one against), then Thorsten has strongly voiced concerns about the investment into the old scheme and people stopped voting while the discussions were up again. I'm in favor of anything that will speed up the voting process or bring in any decision, I think the idea of bringing together all relevant parties is a very good one. > In order to make this meeting manageable, we must limit the number of > attendees. Invited are the existing members of the Fedora Packaging > Committee, Thorsten Leemhuis and certain Red Hat employees relevant to > this discussion. Please talk to me directly if you have been an active > contributor to this in the past but are not included in this invitee list. I would like to suggest Jack Neely and Seth Vital. The latter as a neutral authority on yum and friends to judge on the technical issues raised and the former as the author of the yum support for kmod which IMHO is not working and connot be made to work as well as a big opponent of the new scheme. A working yum is a key point and it would be good to have a fast return of feedback. If they can be convinced that the kmod scheme is unsupportable from yum's POV we're already almost done. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpOBehvw15P2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
