chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx said: > I don't see this as sticking a hand in a fire. It is simply the fact that > removing %build does not affect php-pear packages, there is no reason to add > it. If not adding it causes some problem with the php-pear packages, then > this should be identified. So far no one has identified such problem. One of the tenets of good software development is good documentation. IMHO, documenting the fact that a package doesn't need a %build step is a good thing. I'd much rather see a spec file with: %build # Nothing to build here than to see nothing at all. You know that one of the steps of rpmbuild is to perform the %build step. You can probably rightfully *guess* that if the %build isn't found, it will do nothing. But it's like when you observe nature, looking for some exotic bird: the fact you do not see it doesn't necessarily mean the bird doesn't exist... CHF 0.02... Cheers, Christian -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
