On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:34 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Until now I'm fighting the uname-r-in-name and one-specfile battles, I > really don't want to distract people from these issues until they are > done with. debuginfos are intimately part of that "battle". It's not a distraction, it's required information. > To answer your question on debuginfos: You simply change the name of > the debuginfo package In the specfile? How? Examples? Surely you're not suggesting to just rename the actual debuginfo rpm file on disk after it has been built and be happy? > > As discussed previously in private mail, if you don't have time to > > document something, just upload a few example packages built for let's > > say two successive FC kernels (complete with SRPMS, macro definitions, > > binaries and debuginfos) somewhere and post a link to that somewhere in > > public. > > You mean like http://ATrpms.net/? I have no idea where to find the macro definitions and debuginfo packages for your suggested scheme there. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
