On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 01:21 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:29:08AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 14:04 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 11:26 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > I've created a wiki page outlining the kmdl design as well as showing
> > > > the flaws of the current kernel module scheme ("kmod"):
> > > >
> > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls
> >
> > One thing completely missing from that is debuginfo packages.
>
> Debuginfo packages are handled in the kmdl scheme, I just didn't
> outline the details in the wiki to keep the document from growing
> larger than a packaging comittee member is expected to invest in
> reading.
Without that information, folks who really want to review the suggestion
now need to abort the review due to incompleteness, invest much more
time than reading it would take in (re?)inventing how it could be done,
or take things for granted.
As discussed previously in private mail, if you don't have time to
document something, just upload a few example packages built for let's
say two successive FC kernels (complete with SRPMS, macro definitions,
binaries and debuginfos) somewhere and post a link to that somewhere in
public.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
