>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JK> Or, instead of introducing the insanity of uname-r in name, we can JK> put effort into adjusting rpm and yum to handle this sort of JK> package situation correctly. It seems like what we really need is some sort of two-dimensional versioning. I guess everyone will just laugh at me for suggesting it, but for a plugin/module "foo" having version "M" which works with "packageA" version "N", just call it "packageA-module-foo-M,N", teach the depsolvers how to deal with it, and get on with life. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
