Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
JK> Or, instead of introducing the insanity of uname-r in name, we can
JK> put effort into adjusting rpm and yum to handle this sort of
JK> package situation correctly.
It seems like what we really need is some sort of two-dimensional
versioning. I guess everyone will just laugh at me for suggesting it,
but for a plugin/module "foo" having version "M" which works with
"packageA" version "N", just call it "packageA-module-foo-M,N", teach
the depsolvers how to deal with it, and get on with life.
It may be just me, but I would categorize the latter effort closer to
insanity than the former.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
