On 7/7/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "CS" == Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> writes: CS> Tibbs: do these macros look okay? It took me a while to figure out why pecl-related stuff would be in those macros, but now I see that both /usr/bin/pear and /usr/bin/pecl are in the php-pear package. Everything there looks quite good to me. I just hope that we don't stall out having to wait for an update to the core php-pear package. However, there is a php-pear package in updates/testing at the moment; perhaps we can get this snuck in.
That test release was for my bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196802 Which fixes stuff like: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results-extras/x86_64/php-pear-DB-1.7.6-6.src.rpm/result/build.log I was thinking the same thing that these two could be pushed together. Hopefully Joe is watching this mailing list and knows what we are up to. :) -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
