>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: NM> What's different is the package inter-dependencies. So they get to violate our in-place packaging and naming conventions? Just because they have lots of dependencies? Yes, I'm being deliberately difficult. But I think the point is valid; jpackage is special because it's special, and we have to decide whether we're going to eat it. And if we do eat it, what happens when the next pile of "special" packages comes along? - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
