Le vendredi 14 juillet 2006 à 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > >>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > NM> What's different is the package inter-dependencies. > > So they get to violate our in-place packaging and naming conventions? > Just because they have lots of dependencies? Our naming conventions are not tables of law, they were written to solve specific problems and the people who wrote them didn't think about this particular case, so now they'll have to think about it, come with a solution, put it in the guidelines and everyone will be happy. Instead of screaming "they're not following the holy guidelines" please spent 5s thinking about what the guidelines are about (solve technical problems). I'd have thought the somewhat irritated intervention of Paul Nasrat and all the posts about technicalities vs æsthetics would have make all this clean. (and BTW these people don't _need_ the guidelines, they were doing inter-repo multi-package-updater updates when Fedora Core was still thinking "the next anaconda run will clean it all") -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
