On 7/12/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 06:14, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Else it would be abuse of tags. The only vaguely valid case is combining > BuildArch noarch and ExcludeArch, which is like saying "by nature, the > package contents are arch-independent, but we know that there is a problem > on the N excluded archs". How far do you take this though? ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 s390 s390x alpha sparc sparc64 ia64 arm .....
If you have over 3 excluded architectures, you are arch specific. It is an arbitrary rule.. but sounds good to me. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
