On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:54 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > There is the kmdl proposal which doesn't even need any special plugins > to remain rpm-compliant for both rpm and all depsolvers and while > support for coinstalls for new kernels is missing in all depsolvers it > proved to be trivial to add a < 100 lines easy to maintain plugin to > accomplish that. So there really is only the I-don't-like-uname-r- > in-name issue left ... Axel, what are the differences between the "kmdl" proposal and the existing Fedora kernel module standard? Can you summarize for me? ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
