On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 04:38:59PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 22:19 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 10:32:06PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > rpm -U/-i will nuke or overwrite kernel modules of the running > > > > kernel in a uname-r-less scheme. > But I thought it was already stated that we don't care about rpm used on > the cli to handle these sorts of things. That we've assumed we're > operating at a level above rpm for constructing the transaction set. A scheme were two independent EVRs are merged together into one is broken and banning the tool that exhibits it and pasting it away from others isn't the solution. kmod-foo-1-a just has nothing to do with kmod-foo-<anything>-b (in the simplified notation). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpPEX4iSoNgJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging