> Why would suddenly yum/apt work better? The issues brought up with the > current kernel module scheme didn't address the actual contents of the > packages and Toshio's suggestion only discusses the contents. > > So any raised issue on the naming/versioning of kernel module packages > still remains as discussed - including non-rpm conformant behaviour of > such packages with the rpm -U/-i nuke/conflict situation, which is still > not "fixed" on yum level or any other depsolver's (and having looked > into yum's plugin system which is quite nice BTW, I don't know whether > it will be "fixable" at all) If the existing fedorakmod.py plugin in yum-utils does not handle installs, upgrades, and co-installs of kmod style kernel modules then I'd like a detailed bug report please. Jack > > "Fixing yum or the yum plugin" is in quotes, because it is not yum > that has any deficiencies, but the current kernel packaging > scheme. > > The kmdl scheme works with yum already even w/o a plugin and a plugin > under 100 lines enables coinstalls for new kernel packages. > -- > Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -- Jack Neely <jjneely@xxxxxxxx> Campus Linux Services Project Lead Information Technology Division, NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
