On 7/7/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "CS" == Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> writes: CS> I agree 100%. The guidelines should state something like, if it CS> requires a php version < 18 months old, then the version should be CS> specified. Or something like this. How about: Use of the version is optional if it is satisfied by the originally shipping version in all targeted Fedora releases. (Perhaps s/optional/discouraged/.) Currently, that's php 5.0.4 for FC4 and 5.1.2 for FC5. (FC3 was 4.3.9. That should be kept in mind as the infrastructure project might request an FC3 branch of something they'd like to use.)
I dont see any reason why this should be discouraged, and I think it should actaully be encouraged. But optional is fine. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
