Re: blocking kmdl adoption at all costs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:40:51AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Axel Thimm schrieb:
<rant>
Did I mention that resitance is futile? This is the umpteenth attempt
to find something to block kmdl adoption, that I need to argue
against. If I would had put that energy into something else I would
probably had solved the TOE by now.

Possibly my attempts to get a sane kernel module packaging scheme is
futile ...
</rant>

You are in the packaging committee, I'm not. If you convince the others in the committee that throwing away the current standard (that will be used in RHEL5 afaics) and that going "back" to something that's similar to the stuff we used in fedora.us/lvn is a good thing -> go ahead.

CU
thl

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux