On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 17:51 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> > BTW, when we initially discussed the kmod standard there was also (IIRC)
> > a strong resistance from multiple important and well known people at
> > redhat against overloading %{NAME} with the output of "uname -r". I
> > doubt that option changed. Spot? Jeremy? f13?
>
> Yep. I'm still very strongly against overloading %{NAME}. We don't
> permit any other package to do this for any reason, and I don't want to
> start now. Name is not for versioning.
Well, it's good to know as that kills any review attempt of the
current scheme.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpJTvg6CLAAi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
