Ralf Corsepius wrote : > You intentional don't seem to be wanting to understand: > > I am saying: The FE guideline recommendation supports rebuilding in a > typical user environment. Yours doesn't. As such it is a feature > regression and qualifies as a bug, which is sufficient reason for me not > to approve such packages. I really think you jump to conclusions way too fast here. As I already wrote a few times, I get your point, but as the `id -u` hack doesn't even take care of the default setup (i.e. users need to manually define a %_topdir anyway), and that I consider the proper fix to be defining a %_tmppath, I just find it as m00t as it can get. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 5.91 (FC6 Test2) - Linux kernel 2.6.17-1.2445.fc6 Load : 0.13 0.20 0.19 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
