On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 01:07 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > PHP Packaging Guidelines summary: > > I have updated my template spec file: > http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/spectemplate-pear.spec > > -Readded the rm dot files and removed the %exclude > -Removed the default group since this is unclear/undecided at best so > I guess it is up to the packager to decide > -Removed the "PEAR:" from the summary line (I don't think we should > require all pear packages to put "PEAR:" in the summary) if anyone > disagrees I can add it back because im not too partial either way. > > Questions: > Is using Requires(post): %{__pear} okay, or do i have to explicitly > say /usr/bin/pear? IMO: If %{__pear} is _guaranteed_ to be provided and if it expands to a binary containing an absolute path, yes, this would be fine. One of these conditions can not be assured, then no, %{__pear} would not be OK. Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
