Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 15:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> Check out any one tree style built GCC+newlib rpm, >> Should be fine, only one >> Version: >> tag. > What you say is equivalent to assigning GCC the version of an OS's libc > rsp. vice versa. > > Pardon, but politeness prohibits to further comment on this. > >>> check out autogen + libopts (currently under review). >> Couldn't find that one. Pointer? > currently under review == Review request in bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814 > > autogen-5.8.x ships with libopts-27.1.2.tar.gz integrated > A proper way to build libopts would be to generate > libopts-27.1.2*rpms and autogen-5.8.x*rpms from it. This discussion is digressing even further offtopic, but... IMO, the "proper way" would be to build bootstraps (gcc+newlib and autogen+libopts), then use those to build *separately* each of gcc,newlib and autogen,libopts. Then, no overloading of Version would be required. -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
