Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 13:26 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 12:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 18:41 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Let's file it under hear-say then and move on. >> >>> No comment >> >>> >> >>> c.f. below and note the output of the "echos". >> >> I think it's safe to just say this is an example of bad rpm practice. >> >> If you really want/need two different sources and versions, package >> >> them separately. >> > >> > ... you are ignoring the fact that there exist cases where this is >> > impossible. >> >> Seriously, it's bad practice, don't do it. But don't mind me, go ahead >> and do it, if it's so "impossible" to do otherwise... > > Check out any one tree style built GCC+newlib rpm, Should be fine, only one Version: tag. > check out autogen + libopts (currently under review). Couldn't find that one. Pointer? -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
