>>>>> "ES" == Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: ES> then the '>= 4.2.0' is redundant because every FE has a php >= ES> 4.2.0 and Now that I can understand, but I don't think it's reasonable for package submitters and reviewers to know the full version history of package in Core and Extras. We have to do this on occasion with Perl package dependencies because you will have to filter out the unversioned dependency RPM will find if you want to include a versioned one, and it's always a pain. I think it reasonable to say that the version is optional if it would always be satisfied in any of the targeted Fedora releases. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
