On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:37:20PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 21:02 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > I'm just saying that we are focusing on [...] > > ...generating a lengthy thread and a fuss about changing something > that is not broken, thus negatively contributing to the already > decreasing S/N ratio of packaging related discussions here and > there? Sorry, can't help trolling, but that trend worries me. I did say I assumed this to be an EasyFix item and was myself dissappointed that it turns out to become a lengthy thread. It takes more than one to generate a thread ... And obviously this seems to be something many people have really strong opinion about and also different perception of whether this is broken or not. At this point of time I wished I wouldn't had bring it up, my opinion on that is not that strong and it doesn't seem to get anywhere. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbvvjqeTgtx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
