Axel Thimm schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:42:53AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I think we fight to many battles at once. So let's start concentrate on
one of the easy ones first. As the uname -r debatte is likely to take
some time I choose the "one-spec approach" one.
-- it's already in production (in FE and LVN)
-- we have a lot of packages under review that use the split approach;
There is exactly one (1) package in Fedora and lives only in FE5.
+2 more in cvs that are not build ATM (thinkpad-lkmod and lirc-kmod)
+7 under review
+6 in lvn
-- is time critical because we're already after test2
For this very one package ...
It's to late for FC6 and RHEL IMHO.
- packagers and some reviewers are familiar with it already
I only count Ville and you.
7 packages under review (from different people afaics), jcmasters,
nirik, f13, jeremy, tibbs
- it works in the buildsystem already -- the kmdl scheme would need
special handling that needs to be programmed
In a previous mail you admitted not being kernel agnostic yet because
otherwise your kmods won't build.
The hardcoded stuff it optional and it works *now*.
So changing this will be lot's of trouble without a benefit. So let's
reject this part now.
No, please don't listen to the devil. :)
:)
Thorsten, this is part of the voting, it will be voted upon, if you
allow people to do so.
Sure.
This guerilla tactics are becoming ugly.
That's why I think it's time that spot as leader of this group IMHO
jumps in. Otherwise we waste a lot of time arguing without results.
CU
thl
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
