Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >There is exactly one (1) package in Fedora and lives only in FE5.
> 
> +2 more in cvs that are not build ATM (thinkpad-lkmod and lirc-kmod)
> 
> +7 under review
> 
> +6 in lvn

-67 in ATrpms

Looks like you're raising this to an ATrpms vs livna issue? I thought
we wanted to merge ...

> >This guerilla tactics are becoming ugly.
> 
> That's why I think it's time that spot as leader of this group IMHO 
> jumps in. Otherwise we waste a lot of time arguing without results.

When he showed he tends to a uname-r-in-version solution you seem to
have activated all your muscles against it even though you promised
otherwise before.

You still have your chance to reject it in fesco.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpsJWjc5elYq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux