Le mardi 25 juillet 2006 à 22:52 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit :
> But to come back to Ville's observation: It means that one shouldn't
> mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the same specfile, which
> hopefully noone is doing.
This part is already in the guidelines but you're the first to find a
reason why one is better/safer than the other.
IMHO that's reason enough to make %{buildroot} mandatory in Fedora specs
(will simplify the guidelines too). Hope the packaging dark cabinet is
reading this.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
