>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JK> Does this qualify as an exception to the single ownership rule? Common sense trumps that rule rather often; basically you should never own something that deep core packages like filesystem own and you really shouldn't own something that is owned by packages you depend on. But Perl packages often end up owning the same directories when they're at the same place in the hierarchy but don't depend on each other. For X, though, we do have the xorg-x11-filesystem package. I'm wondering if we shouldn't treat it like the filesystem package, and have it own /usr/lib/xorg/modules and stuff under it. (Because of a package I'm reviewing, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021, I wonder if /usr/share/X11/app-defaults shouldn't also be owned by the xorg-x11-filesystem package.) Then again it's quite possible I'm misunderstanding the purpose of that package. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
