Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
So, is there still any interest in PHP guidelines at all?
Of course.
I have a lot of packages in review or waiting for it to be approved.
Bugs : 190007, 190066, 190101, 190156, 190956, 190957, 190958, 192583
And some others near ready...
I worked up http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP but then
Ville had an idea for a template that doesn't need any special macro
definitions to be provided by the php-pear package. I don't know what
the current state of things is.
Is there any chance of making any forward movement soon? We're going
to start losing packagers if we can't get some reviews done soon.
Regarding PECL modules, I looked over the php-pecl-xdebug package
which is the only PECL module under review currently.
There is also php-pecl-zip (approved but waiting the this guidelines
approved)
The spec is
clean and requires two macros which I have in the above draft,
although the means for determining the API version is completely
different. Could someone comment on the differences and relative
strengths of:
%define php_apiver %((phpize --version 2>/dev/null || echo 'PHP Api Version: 20041225' ) | sed -n '/PHP Api Version/ s/.*: *//p')
and
%define php_apiver %((echo 0; php -i 2>/dev/null | sed -n 's/^PHP API => //p') | tail -1)
Default values are different (0 for php -i, 20041225 for phpize --version).
I think phpize is faster and is made for this.
In a future we'll probably have to check the 3 values (from phpize
--version) as PHP Api Version seems meaningless for me (don't change).
For php-5.1.4 :
PHP Api Version: 20041225
Zend Module Api No: 20050922
Zend Extension Api No: 220051025
For php-5.2.0 (dev)
PHP Api Version: 20041225 (no change)
Zend Module Api No: 20060613
Zend Extension Api No: 220060519
I think "Requires: php >= #.#.#" is not a good thing (except for very
recent version)
as pear extensions could be used with php command.
The requirement of php also imply httpd.
And php already required by php-pear.
In Rawhide, php as split in 3 packages :
php (apache module) and php-cli and php-common
php-api is now provides by php-common (there still have a lot of job
to do to allow php-cli and extension installation possible without php).
Having a template for spec file is probably a good idea,
but the simplest way to create a spec file is to use
"pear makerpm" or "pear make-rpm-spec".
So this commands should conform to this guildelines.
See bug # 185423
Cordialy
Remi.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
