Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 23:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> This discussion is digressing even further offtopic, but... >> IMO, the "proper way" would be to build bootstraps (gcc+newlib and >> autogen+libopts), then use those to build *separately* each of >> gcc,newlib and autogen,libopts. > So you are demanding to abandon features, due to rpm defects? I'm only *suggesting* an alternative, and IMO better/safer, way of packaging these items to avoid the pitfalls associated with building multiple items and possibly using multiple Version: tags inside a single specfile. By all means ignore it, if you deem it beneath you to consider. -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
