On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 11:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 19:14 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > Doesn't FE have sword & gnomesword in it? Based on it's description it sounds like > > it contains religious text. > ... And these had been an issue when they had been under review. > Yeah, looks like this was approved for FE back when we were doing reviews on the mailing list. Do these packages need to be looked at again to make sure that they should be in FE? I actually haven't used them, so I'm not sure if they actually contain forbidden content. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
