Re: Fwd: When to use perl(:WITH_...) requires?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/2/06, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote:
Yep, and that depends on whether your module packages were built using a
perl that has these features enabled or not.  My guess is that they're
probably not too relevant nowadays and could be ignored; I find it
unlikely that a perl without support for threads or large files would
appear in FC any more, and for what it's worth, unlike threading and
large files stuff, PerlIO support is already hardcode-enabled in the FC
perl specfile.

Ahhh, ok, so it's more about what's enabled in the perl the module is
built against, rather than something in particular the module's code
is doing.  That makes more sense.

So, from a packaging perspective, would it be appropriate to embed the
various requires :WITH_ or :WITHOUT_ in conditionals like the one
above, in arch-specific packages?  At least that way one knows they
always sync up between the perl package and the module package.

Or am I really making way too big a deal out of something that should
just quietly be allowed to slip into oblivion... :)

Note: for a definite answer, consult the current FC perl maintainer and
maybe the previous one (Chip Turner).

cc'ed. :)

Thanks-
                               -Chris

--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux