On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 16:00 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > On 7/4/06, Tim Jackson <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what difference it makes whether they are rm'd or excluded. > > They certainly don't want to be %ghost. > > I'll change the spec to %exclude and then we can just remove that once > upstream fixes pear/pecl commands from generating those files. Using "rm -f" in %install is more flexible than %exclude because it doesn't actually require those files to be present; it would work both now and in the future thus possibly avoiding some specfile forks between distro versions, and would avoid the issue (well, probably a non-issue in this particular case) with %exclude and rpm size calculations: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/89661 -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
