On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 13:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I've reworked the Mono page to reflect the new Guidelines we confirmed > yesterday. If people want to take a look, it's here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Mono > > Changes are color coded: Red removes, green adds, blue is a > justification for people who didn't attend the meeting and will be > removed from the final copy. (I probably should have done this before > the meeting rather than after, sorry.) > > If no one objects, I'll replace the current Packaging/Mono page this > weekend. The guidelines now say "no noarch packages". What about packages such as lat, that are already in Extras as noarch and don't contain any arch-specific AOTs? It does, however, install an mcs-built .dll and .exe in %{_prefix}/lib. Is there anything technically wrong with this other than not lining up with the guidelines? Paul. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
