On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:07 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > %perl_sitearch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installsitearch`"; echo $installsitearch)
> > %perl_sitelib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installsitelib`"; echo $installsitelib)
> > %perl_vendorarch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorarch`"; echo $installvendorarch)
> > %perl_vendorlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorlib`"; echo $installvendorlib)
> > %perl_archlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installarchlib`"; echo $installarchlib)
> > %perl_privlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installprivlib`"; echo $installprivlib)
>
> Okay, I have updated the macros file here:
>
> http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/macros.pear
>
> Let me know if this looks okay.
We have leading-underscoreless %perl_* in rpm, %python_* in spec
templates and upstream rpm, and %ruby_* in the forthcoming ruby spec
template and ruby packaging guidelines; any reason for pear/pecl to be
different?
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
